I do not personally care who the president of the USA currently is, as it does not seem to be the president who actually runs the country. I guess it is the people, who fund the presidential candidates and control the media, more like, they elect the president and it does not much matter which side wins. But there are some interesting issues in the 2020 presidential election.
Firstly there is the strange thing that some states do not manage to count the votes in three days. These states have the population from 10 million to 5 million and are not larger than Sweden or Finland. In the Nordic countries votes can be calculated quite well. Admitted, postal votes are opened and calculated in advance in Sweden and Finland. In the USA mail-in votes are opened and calculated only after the other votes are counted. However, why do they do so? It has a serious security risk. In fact, US mail-in voting has a very serious security risk. It is not a risk coming from a private person, who tries to do fraud. Against an attack from an ordinary person without any connections the system is fairly good, but a system must be good against all attacks. Consider the following:
In Finland, if i want to vote in advance, I go to the post office, they check my ID and I post the vote in an envelope. I get marked as having voted. The letter comes to the election office before the election day and gets counted. There is no way I could send 138,000 false mail-in votes after the election day having dated them as being sent before the election day, but they would be still accepted if they arrive by main after the election day. In the USA this is possible. You have to be able to get 138,000 official covers with code numbers sent to people who did not vote. Then you take these letters to the election office as if they came by mail and were delayed in mail. So, we have a possible attack against the system. How is this threat addressed?
There is no checking of the ID of the mail-in voter in the USA. You can simply drop the letter to a secure mailbox (or get it in some other way to the election office, which can be done with some help e.g. from postal officers). The protection is that the envelope cannot be forged as it contains a code that you cannot know. Wait a minute. Who cannot know? The creator of the program printing these envelopes does know how the algorithm works. There are some random seeds. Somebody knows those seeds. There is special paper. Somebody has a machine to make this special paper. That is, a private person without any connections anywhere cannot most probably falsify the envelope, but there are people who can do it. The state that prints these envelopes has the technology to print these envelopes. Who controls the state? I guess you are not going to say, the president. The USA is precisely not a dictatorship of the president. But somebody does know.
There is another protection: if a legal person already voted and they you use the code of the envelope sent to him and make a false mail-in predated vote, then you are caught. But assuming that mail-in votes are not counted before the election day, but only after all other votes are counted, then there is no protection. This is exactly why mailed voted should be counted before the election day votes and no mail-in votes should come after the election day. Strangely, the USA has states that do this just the opposite way. In order to know who voted in the election day you need the lists of people who voted, and you need it fast. In order to get 138,000 false votes, you cannot steam oven legal votes and change the ballot. That is too slow. You must have a set of fast printers and lists of codes of people that did not vote. That is, you cannot do this, somebody can do this. Those, who sent all letters to all people before the election could print the envelopes. Such people can do this.
And then there is the signature the mail-in voter writes on the cover. The signature is compared to a sample, so the election office has a sample of all signatures. That means, someone has a sample of all signatures. Assuming the attacker, Mallory, has this signature database and a list of people who usually do not vote, he can long time in advance print and sign the envelopes. It does not require an army of signature forgers. Let’s say one forger signs 500 envelopes in a day and you want 140,000 envelopes. How long does this take? Ten days from 28 forgers, 28 days from 10 forgers. Later you simply do not send envelopes of those that voted themselves. To do this, you need to know the code numbers and have facilities to print legal appearing envelopes. Humans can do it. The only protection in this system is that the election office is trusted. If it is compromised, there is no secret that is not known to Mallory. Normally, in elections, you trust only the voice counters, and you can observe them and demand recounting. Here, against this attack, recounting voices does not help. The false ballots are there and the envelopes are also just like the real ones. You could try to track if you find some unsent envelope that has the same code than one that was apparently sent, but it is a small chance of finding one of 138,000 false votes in 5 million. And maybe they are not false envelopes. Maybe one can collect 138,000 unused envelopes in some way. Maybe 138,000 letters were sent to wrong addresses and returned (or not sent, and then reused). We should not need to trust the election office. The idea of an election is not to trust too much people in power. Otherwise, why to make an election?
Oh, yes. You can create false mail-in votes and send them earlier. The only condition necessary for fraud is that they are counted after the election day votes are counted. If necessary, you remove those mail-in votes that did vote on the election day, but I guess the US system is that you do not need to remove them: if the person voted on the election day, the mail-in ballot is simply discarded and it only shows in the percentage of discarded votes. Nobody will look for a reason for double voting.
With a security threat there is no need to point out with a finger to some Mallory, who actually cheated in some chosen election, like 2020 USA. I do not say that the 2020 election was not honest. Biden was leading the polls and got 4 million more votes. I just say there is a chance for serious fraud in the US mail-in ballot system, not this 0.00006% or something as the media claims. It is enough to show that there is an attack that can be made. The election system must be secure against all attacks. The main security threat in any election is not an attack of a private person. He usually cannot make enough false votes so that it would matter. The main threat is always an organization, like the government, the establishment, the secret police, some foreign government, and so on. The election system must be secure against attacks by an organization that can have the election envelope program code and random seeds and can make valid envelopes – since the government has this information and it is one of the possible attackers. The US mail-in voting is insecure. It is very off that the main media tries to deny it. It was also very strange to see in two states around 4 am some 138,000 mail-in votes to go all to a single candidate. I do not state it was fraud, but I do state that the mail-in voting system is remarkably poor in the USA. It has a serious security threat, and for sure intentionally, as otherwise security experts would mention this threat, but they do not.
Post Scriptum December 2020: Shiva Ayyadurai has posted a video arguing that voting machines in Michigan moved votes from Trump to Biden. The argument is that the percentage of split votes (votes given to a person) to Trump decrease linearly as the percentage of straight votes (votes given to a party) to Republicans increase. This argument is incorrect. We can assume that in straight votes people, who usually would vote for Republicans voted for Trump with some percentage, say 69%, while people who normally vote for Democrats voted for Trump with some percentage, say 10%. A voting place where 85% of people voted for Republicans would then have 85*0.69+15*0.10=58.6+1.5=60% votes for Trump in the split vote. A voting place with 40% voting for Republicans would have 40*0.69+60*0.1=27.6+6=33.6% voting for Trump. Plotting the line as Dr. Shiva does we get exactly the linearly falling line. Two points on this line are 33.6-40=-6.4 and 60-85=-25. All other points likewise have the same linearly falling trend. However, Ayyadurai does observe one interesting feature: for low numbers of Republican voters the line is not falling, as it should be, but approximately flat. This may indicate that Trump lost more votes in Democratic areas than he should have. Those areas may be cities with black voters. But the explanation can simply be that voters in those areas disliked Trump even more than in other areas.
I do not believe that there was voting machine fraud, but there could have been mail-in bullets dump. This is possible because of the sudden appearance of 138,000 votes for Biden in some states.
7 Comments
Hi Jorma,
EDP audit is not my cup of tea, so I can’t really comment on that aspect, but I think you’re right that those who had access to the databases (at state level) are probably responsible for the fraud.
I have an article (see hyperlink below) in which a timeline is given of how the fraud was done and organized, and in which they also show a short videoclip in which Joe Biden says / admits he organized the fraud. I wonder if that clip is authentic, or on the contrary edited or created.
There is a possibility though that it is authentic, because Joe Biden has a starting dementia problem, and these people do not always know anymore what they are saying or what they better don’t say.
Do you believe the clip is real or rather fake ?
https://www.stopworldcontrol.com/election/?tl_inbound=1&tl_target_all=1
Hi Wilfried,
I looked at the video clip with the audicity program. There is the very clear gap between fraud and organization that may have originally had the word prevention. Audicity shows the gap, but it is so simple that even I could easily remove any word from this video and you would not notice anything odd in the audiorecord. That is, the audiorecord has some simple noice during the gap and you can easily copy it. In magnification it does look like the side close to organization has a paste. The second thing you can look is the mouth movements. I think close to organization Biden’s mouth makes some moves. I doubt this video, as I doubt the videos where Biden says, I am Joe Biden’s busband, Joe Biden. It is too easy to fake these things nowadays.
Here you have the audacity clip. The small oscillation is the pause between fraud and organization and what looks to me like a paste (of noice after removing a word) is the thickened wave before the word organization. It should not be thickened that way as all sound is very clear in this clip. The part that looks as being thicker line looks thicker because it has faster oscillations (should be amplified more), parts of the signal should have about the same spectrum, not higher frequencies in a small part. I think one word is removed.
http://www.pienisalaliittotutkimus.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/biden_video.jpg
But otherwise, there are some strongly suspicious signs that may indicate fraud. I doubt they will be correctly checked. Some Organization of American States, with observers from 13 countries, I guess from the two Americas, says that the mail-in voting system is secure. As even I can give an attack against this system, it is not secure. This simply proves that the organization, US academia and the mass media like to claim that an insecure system is secure.
Who CARES!!!!!!!! Congress is incorporated and the US is a federal corporation. Presidents are elected by the electoral college as executive officers for the UNITED STATES Inc. & c.
It’s odd; ask any person about where your money comes from or what your government is and they won’t know. It is a corporation and was basically created as a protection racket.
Not one mechanic or farmer signed the constitution. It was land speculators, lawyers and bankers.
Read any LAW BOOK older than the 1840’s and you will know what no more than 10,000 people in the world know. Start with authors like Blackstone, Coke, Puffendorf, Fable of the Bees, Hobbes, etc.
The media’s take on all this is to give the relentless consumer class what they want. The corporation will keep on turning, despite what happens.
Voting is a contract. Voting in the jurisdiction of the UNITED STATES Inc., is treason in my eyes and against the law of God.
Quite so. Every state, not only American, is a protection racket: pay your taxes and we protect you, or else. I would not care about that, but what has recently more and more surprised me is that what we call science is telling so many lies. They must know those are lies, or maybe not. There could be some spirit of confusion (?)
>>>…science is telling so many lies. They must know those are lies, or maybe not.
Science doesn’t tell lies as a collectivized whole, rather, it is those mainstream scientists backed by billionaire ‘philanthropists’ and the oligarchs who tell lies and teach the next generations.
That isn’t surprising when six corporations control all of what we see and hear on the television. I’m sure science has been amalgamated and in so has made indepedent scientists who go against the mainstream social pariahs with little oppurtunity to inform the public.
Remember, if they can control what their pupils learn, and what they cannot, then their pupils learn only what a criminal mind wants them to know. And if you then state your case against these scientists, they’ll scuff you off as a quack or ignoramus.
For the scientists who unintentionally perpetuate the misinformation and lies, well, in that case,
I posit, for I have seen it myself, that it would be quite hard for them to accept their mistakes when their entire carrer revolved around teaching others what they know and what they learned from a criminal who gets off scot free.
Look no further than Borreliosis vaccine trials.
In the shortest overview I can give:
Borrelia and spirochetes were known from 1911-1990 to cause permanent, reoccurring disease via antegenic variation and that they are just another relapsing fever organism according to the CDC pre-1990.
That they didn’t like blood but tissue, synovial fluid and brain matter and were virulent and hard to kill even in vivo.
The criminals, having intially authored studies saying how terrible late state disease (borreliosis) is and that it resembles an AIDS/cancer like illness that is severely debilitating and can cause immunosuppression and post sepsis syndromes, decided in 1992 to manufacture a vaccine against a spirochete infection that undergoes antegenic variation. This, of course, is impossible, you cannot create a vaccine against Borrelia Burgdorferi, just as you cannot create a vaccine of its lesser virulent cousin syphilis. It is impossible due to B. Burgdorferi’s sophisticated antigen sequencing and OspA bleb shedding as if it was releasing strafe from a fighter jet. Plum Island? Look that up!
The criminal ‘scientists’ didn’t care. So, how did they get to distribute the vaccine? They made a fake one using an endotoxin to supress a persons immune system, low enough, that they wouldn’t test positive whilst in phase trials.
So, they firstly, rasied the cuttoff noise standard on their test, ie. falsified their diagnostic test, the ELISA, in order that 85% of Borreliosis victims would not test positive. They then changed the name borreliosis to Lyme Disease. What is Lyme disease? In their legal lawyerly lying samantics game, Lyme Disease is just a bad arthritic knee and no other symptoms, ie. 15% of borreliosis who get high antibody counts who will test positive when they take their falsified ELISA test. They used this same test in their vaccine trials. And what did they find, ahhhhh, yes, an 85% effective fake vaccine. If you throw 85% of victims out of the equation by raising the cuttoff standard, for these 85% had barely tested positive before this raising, then you have an estimated 85% effective vaccine with 15% of the HLA-linked hyperactive antibody victims testing positive and 85% testing negative and being misdiagnosed.
We still use this test today!!!! Why? It can only be due to arrogance which is the germinal seed of a criminal mind.
The vaccine was immunosupressent and they used a deadly endotoxin (Lipoprotein OspA or Pam3Cys) which caused tolerizaton and anergy of the immune system. The
patenteers of this vaccine and recombinant kits and diagnostics called themselves the “enterprise” called the ALDF who are nearly ALL Zionists from Israel.
Even the Navy hates them for stealing taxpayers funds which I discovered in a declassified letter, where Mr. McSweegan the bioweaponeer who illegally went to Israel to learn all about bio-weapons pretended to be a whistleblower and sent a letter to Barry Goldwater about how he was mistreated in the military.
What really happened was that he was stealing funds and the navy, although pissed off, didn’t care.
The Navy basically told me everyone hates him and he is an idiot. Incompetance fallacy? The navy would rather let him go off scot free then accept their incomptance in letting a criminal siphon taxpayer funds.
These faux scientists are not stupid, they are criminals backed by BIG MONEY in the private sector, and if they’re not, they are siphoning taxpayer funds. They are mostly parasites.
So, what’s the agenda, especally with COVID, despite what we think COVID is or isn’t. MONEY. Lots of money! Back in the 60’s criminals wanted to patent all the Vector Borne Diseases because of their growing number due to global pollution and changing climate. They also wanted to pool people’s blood to find genetic malignancies that could be sold to insurance companies, blah, blah, blah.
COVID is a catalyst; an oppurtunity to revitalize a vaccine market as well as the 4th industrial stakeholder capitalist agenda.
I invite you to read some of Klaus Schwab’s books who founded the World Economic Forum, such as Covid-19: The Great Reset.
The plutocrats don’t hide their agendas, they are just written in dry, long scholarly books such as the Club of Rome’s sustainabilty white paper’s where they openly say that in 2020 we need to “shock the public” with something big—”an event”—in order to implement the 4th industrial revolution which is just stakeholder capitalism under the new banner of sustainabilty, automation, AI, IoT, and surviellance/security niche markets as well as cleaner energy and carbon capture.
Covid-19 is their catalyst, they admit this time and time again and they exclaim, through securization acts, that the ‘New Normal’ will remain forever.
Thanks for your comment. I have to think about it.