The final events of the messianic conspiracy in the time of Jesus

I have continued reading Tegtmeier (E. R. Carmin, Das Schwarze Reich) to brush up my German, but unfortunately he has read Baigent’s, Leight’s and Lincoln’s The Holy Blood, the Holy Grail and repeats their nonsense theory, which Dan Brown later used. So, in the middle of the book there is the Priory of Sion (it was the Mizraim lodges, and should one look for the conspiracy today, I suggest searching for a group of very rich Zionists), there is Berenger Saniere (not important, search for Masonic people, Tegtmeier tries to connect Saniere with Martinists, but that is not true), there is the female God in Gnosticism (they did not have it, also, Roman Mithraism was after Jesus, not before), that Vatican was behind the conspiracy (anti-Catholism is a trade-mark of Masonic and Jewish circles, there were Machiavellian Popes, but long ago) and there is even the Magdalena having a child with Jesus and these founding the Merovingian dynasty, which tries to take over the world.

           OK, that is not very believable. I try to explain what, in my opinion, happened. Thus, Herod Agrippa I was to be the king Messiah and to start the war, but he died (was killed). Jesus was the prophet Messiah and died on the cross. Basically all that the Church tells is correct, only that the supernatural parts were make-believe. But let us go to the year 58 AD. St. Paul is in captivity by the Roman prefect Antonius Felix. Felix has a new wife, Drusilla, a daughter of Herod Agrippa I. Felix fell in love with Drusilla, a married woman. Then one Simon magician, who cannot be anybody else than Simon Magus, was sent to her. She divorced her husband (which is against the Jewish law) and married Felix, I guess for some higher purpose. Paul met Felix and Drusilla. Paul also met Herod Agrippa II and Berenice, two other children of Herod Agrippa I, but Herod Agrippa II did not want to be the king Messiah (this is my interpretation. Acts only says that Herod was not converted to be Christian). I accept Eisenman’s arguments that Paul was a Herodean and in the plan of Herod Agrippa I, but I also think he was sincerely converted after he saw bright light (which I think was magnesium light. I have written a post of the light). Clearly, Herod Agrippa I’s family is still in the messianic picture, but none of the family wants to play the king Messiah. But Jews knew that the star would appear about 70 years from 11 BC. Yehoshua Ben Hananiah tells in one account of a star, which appears every 70 years. In the year 11 BC appeared Halley’s Comet which started the messianic aspirations of Herod Agrippa I.

           The star appeared in 66 AD and the started. Jews certainly started it: there was the comet and a star constellation of the shape of a sword, and other signs. At this time one of the last Hasmoneans, later known as Josephus Flavius, had agreed to be the king Messiah. Why otherwise would you have a Pharisee (Pharisees did not join the revolt) be the commander of Galilee, when Galilee was the core rebellious district? But Josephus knew noting of military issues and lost to Vespasian. He surrendered and switched sides. He announced that Vespasian is the Messiah and Pharisee Rabbis agreed. Such a declaration hardly could be accepted by Rabbis from anyone else than the intended king Messiah, I think.

           You may wonder where pro-Roman Herod Agrippa I and Berenice were at this time. When the war started they escaped from Rome to Galilee, yes, the center of anti-Roman attitudes, but also the district ruled by their Hasmonean kinsman Josephus. They also surrendered to Romans. Then Berenice had a love affair with the son of Vespasian, Titus. In 68 AD Nero made suicide (I think a friend of Paul helped in it and it was not a suicide) and the next year, 69 AD, there were four emperors. Vespasian’s army shouted him to be the emperor, but actually Berenice, who was very rich, helped in this with her money. That is, soldiers shout you as an emperor, if you give them money, the same with the Roman Senate. Vespasianus become the emperor. Berenice came to Rome in 75 AD and lived with Titus as his unmarried wife. But Romans did not like the Jewish Queen, so Titus sent her away. She was away when Vespasianus died of an infection in 79 AD and Titus become the emperor. Titus was a good emperor, but Jews thought of him as Titus the Wicked as he had burned the temple. Titus had in this short time several problems. Vesuvius erupted, Drusilla and her son died in it. That was not caused by people, but there was also a fire in Rome and a plague. They may have been made by people. There was a conspiracy against Titus, but such there are. Even his brother Domitian was conspiring against Titus, but he did not punish Domitian. Yet more, there appeared a false-Nero. If one thinks that in those times there could not have been a false-Jesus playing the resurrected Jesus, let us notice that there were several false-Neros fulfilling prophecies (most probably Jewish or Christian) that Nero will return.

           In September 81 Titus died of disease in the same farm-house where his father had died. His last words were: “I have made but one mistake”. Roman authors suspect some foul play, like that Domitian poisoned him. Talmud (Gittim 56b) gives a different reason: an insect went through his nose and for seven years picked his brain, as God’s punishment for destroying the temple. Calculating seven years back from September 81 gives September 74. That would be about the time when Berenice had informed Titus that she will come to Rome and live as his wife. For Talmud Titus died because God’s revenge and God’s revenge may easily have been delivered by Jewess Berenice. In any case, the year 74 AD does not suggest that Dominitian had anything to do with the death of Titus, but Berenice was one of the very few people who could have had a private access to both Vespasian in 79 AD and Titus in 81 AD in the same farm-house outside Rome, a secret meeting of a queen, financial helper and a lover.

Berenice was around 53 years old when Titus died. She disappears from the history. Herod Agrippa II never married (he may have had a love affair with Berenice). There were no more male Hasmoneans after he died in Rome in 92, at least not any to be the king Messiah. Or maybe there was one. A Jewish legend says that the Messiah was born in the day the temple burned. If so, he might have been the son of Herod Agrippa II, with Bernice as Bernice lived with Agrippa II and there were rumors that they were lovers. In 115-117 AD the son would have been 45-47 years old, which is fine for the king Messiah. In those years there was the Kitos war. Hasmoneans may have been behind that war, but unfortunately historical records are too meager to resolve this issue.

            But let us move forward in time, to 132 AD. At this time the Bar Kokhba war started. Emperor Hadrian had initially wanted to rebuild Jerusalem for Jews, he was pro-Jewish, but then he decided to build Aelia Capitona and on the Temple mound he build a temple for Jupiter. That temple, naturally, was the abomination of desolation for Jews. Herod Agrippa I had tried to get Caligula to put his statue to the Temple of Jerusalem as the abomination of desolation to start the war, but Caligula had backed off and today it is claimed that Herod Agrippa I convinced Caligula not to place the statue to the temple. How would it have come to Caligula’s mind to do such a thing, and would he not have first asked his good friend Herod Agrippa I? I am quite sure that Herod Agrippa I gave Caligula the idea, because the time from this statue plan to the time when Agrippa tied to declare himself as divine (and got poisoned) is the time given in Daniel’s prophecy. I have written a post of this. So, who gave initially pro-Jewish Hadrian such a crazy idea as to put Jupiter’s temple on the place of the Temple? I assume it must be messianic Jews, notably Rabbi Akiva. It was Rabbi Akiva who gave Simon Bar Kosiba the name Bar Kokhba, the son of the star, from the Star Prophecy. Talmud tells it was some Samaritan, who convinced Hadrian to do such a thing, which surely would lead to a revolt. Samaritans would guess what the result would be, so I do not think it was a Samaritan, or at least the idea could not come originally from a Samaritan but from a messianic Jew.

            It looks like Aelia Capitona was built in the time period 130-132 AD. If the Jews had not made preparations for a war before 130 AD, it would have taken them some time to be convinced that Hadrian does intend to pollute the place of the temple. They would have started with protests. But in 132 AD Bar Kochba started the rebellion from underground passages. Jews had 200,000 well-armed men and a large number of tunnels. These preparations for the war must have taken a longer time than one-two years, which means that the reason for the war was not the temple of Jupiter. The war was decided earlier, Hadrian was cheated to build Jupiter’s temple in order to do what the persecutor of Jews was to do before the Messiah comes.

           Is there any proof of this? There is the Turn Shroud. More and more scientific investigations point out to it being from the first century and if so, the image is that of Jesus. The image can only be made by a miracle or a so rare natural event that it counts as a miracle, or by humans. As I do not like to use miracles in explanations, I prefer the human-made alternative. If so, the image was made by very strong light, which came through the material and, with help of some light-active resins of animal products, printed a photograph to the textile. To make such light (apparently magnesium light) requires knowledge and economic resources that were not within the reach of anybody but the richest people, such like Berenice, who could put Vespasian on the throne of Rome by paying soldiers and the Senate, or friends of Herod Agrippa I. It may be interesting to add that the father of Vespasian was a banker and tax collector in Asia Minor. These messianic conspiracies are bankers’ plots.     

           But what happened to the light? If there was a way to make very bright light, this knowledge was not lost when Hasmoneans died out. Maybe it did not disappear. Drusilla was visited by Simon Magus and Simon is often given as the founded of Gnosticism. Gnostics had a light rite called the Bridal Chamber. This is around 100-300 AD. Also Roman Mithraism must have had some bright light: Mithras is an ancient Iranian god of light, yet their temples were underground and no sunlight could come there, this is around 80-100 AD, not before. One presumably Mithras ritual in the Greek Magical Papyri seems to me an alchemical recipe for producing metallic magnesium from magnesium oxide. John of Patmos around 90 AD in the Apocalypse says that the false prophet can bring the light of the sun to the earth. Finally, the Byzantine Empire had the Greek fire, we still do not know what it was, but it burned under water.

            OK, I know you think this theory is as unbelievable as the one in the Holy Blood and the Holy Grail. But I have studied this thing for a long time. So did Baigent, Leigh and Lincoln, but I am I and they are definitely not me.