Did Hitler lose the Second World War on purpose? part 5

I finished the part in Tegtmeier’s book dealing with Nazis. Sadly it turns out that Tegtmeier joins the group (David Irving, Jochen Thiess, Henry Picket, Walter Schellenberg), who claim that there is evidence that Hitler did not believe that England would declare war with Germany if Hitler attacks Poland. Either these people are Hitler apologists, or they want to get their work published by not telling what they actually think happened. Otherwise I cannot explain such a view, since they must rwalize that this so called evidence is only some words that Hitler told to Nazis or other Germans. Naturally, if Hitler had infiltrated the Nazi party, his words to members of the infiltrated organization are no evidence of anything. Instead, we have to look at his deeds.

            When the UK had given guarantees to Poland, the basic assumption is that if Germany attacks Poland, the UK declares a war on Germany. This is what happened. Thus, Hitler may well have assured other Germans that he is certain that the UK will not declare a war, but he could not have been sure of it himself (unless he had a dream and he really believed on dreams, which I strongly doubt). Hitler did not have any such assurance by a secret agreement guaranteeing that the UK will not declare a war. He knew that Freemason Churchill was for the war and had considerable influence in England. Thus, Hitler assured Nazis but could not be sure himself. Most probably he thought that the UK will declare a war, as that is the default assumption and if the UK wanted a war with Germany, giving guarantees to Poland was a good excuse for it to declare the war. I would assume Hitler understood that Roosevelt wanted a war and international bankers wanted a world war. As international bankers and Freemasons usually want the same, he could have concluded that Freemasons, like Churchill want a war. 

            Hitler could assume, like other Nazis could assume, that the UK will not attack immediately and he can proceed with the attack to Poland. This was so because the UK was not prepared to an immediate war. France also did not attack. That was less certain, but from the attack to the West it seems that Hitler got some information from French plans, maybe from friends in England. This being so, Hitler could have simply waited. The phony war would have continued and Hitler could have proposed a peace. Instead, Hitler attacked as soon as weather conditions allowed it: it was raining for most of the time and planes could not be effectively used in rain. The attack does not show that Hitler wanted to avoid the war.

            During the attack Hitler let the British to evacuate form Dunkirk. This action should at least have been discussed with the military staff. While it might be seen as a proposal for peace, defeating the British in Dunkirk would also have encouraged the British to make a peace. Hitler’s action helped the UK to stay in the war.

            If the goal of letting the British to evacuate in Dunkirk was to show that Germany has no ill intentions, then the Battle of Britain does not fit to the strategy. This air war weakened German air forces in a serious way: German pilots, landing on the enemy area, were either shot or taken as POWs. British pilot losses were smaller. The number of planes and airports did not matter as both sides could produce enough planes and Germans could not destroy all airports. This action (which could not possibly have lead to the invasion of England) destroyed Luftwaffe and practically guaranteed German defeat in the war.

            Hitler made several peace offers to British (and later to the USA), but it is the content of the peace offers. Germany could not conquer the UK and after Hitler was in war with France, England, the Soviet Union and the USA, that is, summer 1941, it was clear that Germany will lose the war. The peace offer should have been formulated to reflect this reality: Germany should have offered to withdraw from all occupied area, give some of its own area, pay reparations for all damages, and change the government. Obviously, this is not what Hitler offered, so the offers were rejected.

            The flight that Rudolf Hess made to England is also sometimes given as a piece of evidence. It is possible that Hess had a peace offer from Hitler, but as said, Hitler did not offer such a peace that could have been accepted: Germany was going to lose. I do think Hess made the trip with sincere hopes of being able to agree a peace, but Hess was a person, who had joined the Thule Society believing in the ideas of that society. Hitler was sent to DAP by German army intelligence as a spy. That is a difference. We should not expect that a spy shares the beliefs of the organization that is spies.

            The simple reasons why Hitler would have been an infiltrator in the Nazi party are as follows:

1) He was sent to DAP as a spy, that is, an infiltrator. DAP already had the name NSDAP at this time and according to Tegtmeier Hitler did not invent much of NSDAP ideas: they were all from the Thule Society. The whole story how Hitler joined DAP is absurd. Sebottendorf, the leader, stepped aside and Eckart, Hess and Rosenberg were looking for a future dictator to appear. Then they approve Hitler, sent there as a spy by German army intelligence. One comes easily to think that what really happened is that Sebottendorf had promised Eckart, Hess and Rosenberg that the correct man they need will be sent to them soon.

2) The Thule Society was created by von Sebottendorf, who had Masonic connections, and it is very reasonable to doubt that the Thule Society was any real anti-Semitic, anti-Bolshevik rightist Aryan secret society. It is very likely that it was Theosophic anti-Semitic secret society, which had the goal of pushing Jews to Palestine. Sebottendorf become a Mizraim Freemason in Turkey. Turkish Freemasonry was closely connected with Donmeh, crypto-Jews, followers of Jewish Messiah Shabbatai Zevi. They believed that the Messiah will be reborn as many times as needed in order to take Jews to Palestine and to destroy the enemies of Jews. This must have been the real goal of Sebottendorf when he created the Thule Society.

3) Hitler made very many errors in the later part of the war. His errors caused the German defeat. Germany would have lost in any case, but much later. We may ask if these were errors or sabotage.

4) If the Thule Society was set up by Masonic circles for driving the Jews to the East to be later sent to Palestine, then NSDAP must have had a spy. This spy must have been in the position to decide the outcome of the war. In NSDAP such a person could only be Der Führer. Masons and Jewish bankers would not have accepted Nazi German victory, even though they needed Nazis in order to uproot Jews in order to take them to Palestine. The persecutor of Jews had to be destroyed. They had to be sure that Germany loses and needed their man to make it sure.

           These four logical reasons are much stronger than any comments Hitler told other Nazis of being amazed that England wants to have a war with Germany, a racial brother. Only a very strong Freemason-Zionist-denier (a new world order denier) would consider such comments as evidence of anything.  There is also a simple reason why Hitler wanted a war with the UK. Hitler transported Jews to the East. He did not try to exterminate them, as is shown by demographic calculations.  Therefore Hitler wanted to settle Jews somewhere. A simple reduction of alternatives shows that the place where he wanted to settle the Jews was Palestine. The UK was holding the UN mandate of Palestine and was unwilling to let more Jews to Palestine and very unwilling to establish a state of Israel in Palestine. The UK had been forced to give the Balfour declaration under German threat. German threat, in the Battle of Britain, was a possible way to change the British attitude, and after the war the UK did agree to the creation of Israel. Obviously, Hitler had to get the UK into a war in order to get the place where to put the Jews.