The holocaust conflict between Israel and Poland seems to go on and on. Now one of them mentioned the question which ones should feel ashamed for not fighting the Nazis and which ones not.
Well, this is some history of countries that I do not know that well. I think I remember something like this that the Soviet Union agreed to create an army unit from Polish soldiers who were taken as war prisoners in the Soviet attack to Poland 1939. This was the same Soviet Union which in 1939 was in pact with Germany and after conquering Eastern Poland attacked Finland. Nevertheless, the times were different. I guess the year was 1943 or 1944.
This newly established unit had native Poles and Polish Jews, as Jews exceptionally were not exempted from army service in Poland in 1939, as they almost always had been in free Poland. The unit was to be moved to Italy to fight the Nazis and later indeed Poles were fighting Nazis heavily in Monte Cassino and other places.
For some reason that I never understood, the unit stayed some time in Palestine. Most Polish Jews escaped at that time, so they become renegades. They had got army training, probably they took with them army weapons, later they would make terror acts against the British and Arabs in Palestine. Some of the Jews stayed in the unit and actually did take part in some small battles against Nazis. I guess it was because they wanted fighting experience for the future Israel defense forces and it was not for liberating Poland or the Free World.
Maybe it was like that, maybe I remember incorrectly, but I intended to write a post of Nixon. Watergate was kind of a conspiracy. It is a good time to write of Nixon since the famous Tele-evangelist Billy Graham died very recently, in 21. February 2018.
His death reminded the journalists of the Israeli newspaper Haaretz of the remarkable day in February 1, 1972 when Richard Nixon and Billy Graham had a discussion of Jewish power in the USA. Billy Graham said things like: ”They’re the ones putting out the pornographic stuff,” and that: ”I go and I keep friends with Mr. Rosenthal (executive editor) at The New York Times and people of that sort, you know. And all — I mean, not all the Jews, but a lot of the Jews are great friends of mine, they swarm around me and are friendly to me because they know that I’m friendly with Israel. But they don’t know how I really feel about what they are doing to this country. And I have no power, no way to handle them, but I would stand up if under proper circumstances.”
Was to comment on pornography incorrect? Apparently it was correct. An article by Nathan Abrams in the Jewish Quarterly, March 1, 2018, confirms Graham’s opinion.
The evangelist also said that “the Jewish stranglehold has got to be broken or the country’s going down the drain.” Nixon agreed. Of course, Nixon was a well known anti-Semitist. He actually tried to fight the cabal.
There is a memo by White House personnel director Fred Malek. It confirms that Nixon transferred three Jews (Peter Henle, Harold Goldstein and Leon Greenberg) working in the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) to less-visible jobs. The reason was that the BLS had intentionally reported a too large figure 6.3% for unemployment July 2, 1971 claiming that the correct figure 5.6% was just unimportant fluctuation. As success in treating unemployment was important for the popularity of the government, Nixon was angered to BLS and he believed that the manipulators of the BLS figures were Jews, who had their own political agenda.
Fred Malek also told that Nixon believed that a Jewish cabal was out to get him. There is a recording from July 3, 1971 where a man called Colson says to Nixon that Jews are out to kill them and from the same day between Nixon and his Chief of Staff Harry R. Haldeman where Nixon says that the administration is full of Jews and most of them are disloyal. Hadleman says that the whole organization is against Nixon and that the Jews have the ability to do what they want to do, which is to hurt Nixon and Hadleman. July 24, 1971 Nixon tells that there is the Jewish cabal. We can conclude that Nixon was quite aware of the Jewish power in the US administration already in July 1971.
Wait a minute, when was Watergate?
The break-in at the Democratic National Committee headquarters in was in June 17, 1972. The vote to establish a select committee to investigate the issue set in February 7, 1973. These hearings lasted from May 17, 1973 to August 7, 1973. The House Judiciary Committee hearings started in May 9, 1974. Nixon resigned in August 1974. Watergate started half a year after Nixon and Graham had their private conversation.
We know about this private conversation because Haldeman told of the content of this discussion in his memoirs published in 1994. At that time Billy Graham denied having said anything against Jews. The tapes were released in 2002.
Apparently since Franklin D. Roosevelt every American president recorded his own telephone conversations and discussions in the Oval Office and in the Cabinet Room. Lyndon B. Johnson was recording his conversations. First Nixon removed the listening equipment, but then he decided that also he wanted to record his conversations.
The equipment was installed in February 1971 and switched off July 18, 1973 after the select committee hearings concerning the Watergate scandal. The system had concealed microphones and was operated by the Secret Service. The existence of the system was known to Nixon, to his Chief of Staff Harry R. Haldeman, to Haldeman’s assistant Alexander Butterfield, to Nixon’s private secretary Rose Mary Woods, and probably to some unnamed agents in the Secret Service. It was Butterfield who told about the tapes to the Watergate investigators.
John F. Kennedy had also recorded his own conversations. Secret Service agent Robert Bouck installed hidden listening equipment for John F. Kennedy in the spring 1962. Around September 1962 Bouck installed an additional Dictabelt listening system to the Oval Office and possibly to Kennedy’s bedroom. Listening equipment was secret and known to J. F. Kennedy, Secret Service agent Robert Bouck, Kennedy’s personal secretary Evelyn Lincoln, and probably to some unnamed Secret Service agents. Kennedy did not have access to the tapes. The tapes were stored next to the desk of Kennedy’s personal secretary Elelyn Lincoln. It is told that JFK could turn listening on and off from several hidden switches, but JFK was already dead when anything was told about this equipment. Bouck disconnected the equipment when he heard that JFK was shot, that is November 1963. Disconnect in this case probably means that Bouck removed it. The information of what the equipment was like can come only from Robert Bouck or from Evelyn Lincoln. Lincoln and Bouck did not know why JFK wanted to record his own conversations. They suspected that JFK wanted to write memoirs after his time in the office and the tapes were for that purpose.
I do not find this believable. Why JFK wanted to record what was said in his bedroom? If he wanted memoirs from bedroom, wouldn’t a hidden camera have been better?
This sounds suspicious to me. JFK’s death was a conspiracy. In his office was hidden listening equipment. Did he really control the equipment? Maybe JFK did not have any switches that he could operate. Maybe he did not even know of the equipment, or at least that his bedroom was being listened.
When Kennedy started in his office in 1961 one of the first and most serious problems was Israel’s nuclear weapon program. The CIA had taken photos of the Dimona nuclear weapon plant, which Israel claimed to be a textile plant. In May 18, 1963 Kennedy demanded that Americans must be allowed to investigate Dimona. In this letter from JFK to Ben Gurion, Kennedy mentions that he had spoken with Ben Gurion in May 1961 of the American visit to Dimona. That is the visit that Israelis improvised to avoid an American investigation of Dimona. This happened in spring 1961, the same time when Bouck installed the listening equipment to Kennedy’s office, but there may not be any connection.
Kennedy ended up dead while Nixon was only forced to resign. Bill Clinton had a bit similar problems as Nixon with a Jewish girl, Monica Lewinski, but Clinton did not resign. Monicagate might have been one of the reasons why George W. Bush was elected as the President. Then happened 9/11 and the war in Iraq and the war against terrorism, but again, there is no connection.
We were in the Nixon affair. The key person in the Watergate scandal was (half-Jewish) John Ehrlichman. He was convicted to a year and a half in prison for conspiracy, obstruction of justice and perjury. Nixon did not know in advance of the break-in. In a tape from June 23 Nixon asks Haldeman: “Who was the asshole who ordered it?” but at this time no-one knew of the tapes. Watergate did not matter to the voters: in November 1972 Nixon was re-elected as the President with a landslide.
Meanwhile in the Middle East the Arab coalition attacked Israel on the Yom Kippur Day, October 6, 1973. American military experts expected Israel to win Arabs in 3-4 days, but on the 9th of October it did not look like that. Israel had suffered heavy losses and was preparing to use nuclear weapons in order to avoid losing. Here is a connection to Israeli nuclear weapons. Nixon ordered an air lift to recover Israel’s material losses in October 9, 1973. This must mean the USA gave Israel lots of weapons and ammunition so that they would not use the a-bomb and very possibly start a Third World War. A week later Israel had penetrated deep into the western side of Suez. The USA and the Soviet Union started peace negotiations and since that time an Arab coalition has not attacked Israel.
At home Nixon’s administration was under attack. On July 1973 Alexander Butterfield told about the tapes. Vice President Spiro Agnew had to resign in October 10, 1973 because of issues which were not connected with Watergate. In November 1973 an 18.5 min gap was found in the recordings of June 20, 1972. Nixon’s personal secretary Rose Mary Woods took responsibility for the gap (though she did not make it). On April 1974 Nixon released transcripts of the tapes. The hearings of the House Judiciary Committee started in May 9, 1974. July 24, 1974 the Supreme Court ordered that the tapes, and not only transcripts, must be delivered, and on August 5, 1974 the smoking gun tape was released.
On the same tape from June 23, 1972 where Nixon asked Haldeman which asshole ordered the burglary there is the criminal offence. On the tape Nixon agreed that his staff would ask the CIA to stop the FBI investigation of the funding of the burglary on the grounds that it was a national security issue. This was considered illegal, the smoking gun of a crime. Nixon resigned in August 8, 1974.
Considering that Nixon had e.g. ordered the coup in Chile where the democratically elected president, Salvador Allende, was replaced by Augusto Pinochet and killed, asking CIA to advice FBI does not seem so much, but Americans think what media tells. Allende was a Marxist, so that explains. Nixon did end the Vietnam War, improve relations with China, started the missile restriction treaties with the Soviets and put the man in the moon. In general, he did a few positive steps, but as Machiavelli so well explained, people in power must do all kind things that are not always so moral. It is a bit absurd that Nixon was kicked out by Watergate, which he did not order.
But that is not my worry here. I am worried of a strange pattern in certain historical events. These events seem to take place in the USA and there is no indication that this pattern has yet disappeared. If we look at some more certain cases, this strange pattern is easier to detect.
The 9/11 case is one of the best demonstrated ones. I do not think that it is scientifically possible argue that the buildings collapsed because of fires and airplanes. There had to be explosives. Then the question of who did the terrorist strike can be replaced by an easier question of who could set the explosives for controlled demolition. Not so many could. The clues from the dancing Palestinians, turning out to be Israeli Jews, raising the insurance of WTC to cover a terrorist strike shortly before 9/11 by a Jewish investor Larry Silverstein, the warnings received by the Israeli firm Odigo two hours earlier, and so many other small things, make virtually certain that we know who the real perpetrators of the 9/11 strike were. The result of 9/11 was destruction of Iraq, which removed one challenge for Israeli military supremacy in the Middle East.
The second well-studied case is the holocaust. The Zionist program of a new Israel being in existence long before Hitler, the fact that American Jews were against taking Jewish refugees to the USA in the time of WWII, the fact that the sum of missing Jews does not even nearly equal the figure that is given as the only correct one, the fact that the only remaining evidence of specific methods of massacre is witness statements as the rest have been broken, the fact that the Bible predicts the persecution and the holocaust and some predictions were realized intentionally, all of these together imply that we know who the real perpetrators of the holocaust were. The result of the holocaust was establishment of Israel.
What about the JFK case? There are people, who think that JFK was killed by mafia because he got into problems with the mob. There is a fairly large consensus among JFK murder researchers that there was more than one shooter. I also concluded that this was the case by studying the JFK Dictabelt. It is very possible that one of the assassins was a mob killer, but if so, it was a paid assassination and not because the Kennedy brothers had angered mafia bosses. The condition for killing a leader, like the president, is that there is a good reason to believe that the next leader is better than the dead one was. The mob had no reason to think Lyndon B. Johnson would be any softer towards crime. Instead, Johnson was much softer towards Israel’s nuclear weapon program than Kennedy. That might be a motive, but where is the evidence? Let me just mention that in the JFK Dictabelt issue the Audiograph data seems to be modified. It is not what the mob could have done as the disc was in police custody. The data was modified by insiders and quite high up. The other thing to notice is that the media accepted the official version. Together these two observations mean that the JFK case was similar to the 9/11 case, where there also were insiders and the media gave its support to the improbable official version. If these are similar cases, then the culprits may have been the same ones. One result of the murder of JFK is that no US president any more questioned Israeli right to develop nuclear weapons.
There is the strange pattern. How, it at all, it relates to Nixon, is not so clear, but it can be said that after Nixon no American president has ever dared to fight the cabal. So far, but maybe things are slowly a-changing. After all, nothing lasts forever.